They Took Everything.Then Made Sure He Couldn't Fight Back.

The conduct at issue — assigning securities class action settlement claims to business entities — was established as entirely lawful by the United States Supreme Court in Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, 554 U.S. 269 (2008), decided unanimously, thirteen years before the first charge was filed. Sprint was not discovered after conviction. It was the defense raised at trial, presented to the jury, briefed on appeal, and submitted to the Supreme Court. Not one court has ever explained why Sprint does not make this conduct legal. Not once in four years.

The SEC filed its complaint the same day as the arrest. On November 9, 2021 — at a hearing held without notice while Mr. Cammarata sat in custody in Miami, 1,200 miles away and unable to attend — that same judge declared "I consider this a crime against the courts" before seeing a single piece of evidence. He had already a 900-page ex parte order freezing over $78 million without the irreparable harm finding that Rule 65(b) requires as a mandatory prerequisite. No jurisdiction. Simultaneous hearings 1,200 miles apart while the defendant sat in custody. A forged service document. A summary judgment granted without satisfying a single required legal element. Every step designed to freeze the money, strip any ability to fight back, and protect the cover-up.

The lead SEC prosecutor, John V. Donnelly III, is married to an active attorney in the Executive Office of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals — the exact court where every appeal ended up. This was never disclosed. Four appeals have now sat at that court for up to two years with no government response and no rulings. When judicial misconduct complaints were filed to that court, they were denied with no explanation and no review of a single documented violation. Perhaps that is why.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(f) requires courts to issue specific discovery directives ensuring Brady compliance. Brady v. Maryland requires the government to produce exculpatory evidence — including controlling Supreme Court precedent that proves the conduct was legal. Had either been followed, Sprint would have been produced, and there would never have been a case. Perhaps that is why neither was followed.

When the controlling Supreme Court precedent was raised and proved the crime was impossible, the government should have dismissed the case. But six agencies had committed years of resources, millions in taxpayer dollars, and 5.5 million pages of documents. They had already illegally seized over $150 million and imprisoned an innocent man. Admitting they were wrong meant admitting everything. So they didn't stop. They covered it up — fabricating evidence, committing perjury, suppressing witnesses, altering transcripts — all the way from the district court to the Third Circuit to the United States Supreme Court.

When the fraud case started unraveling, the same prosecutors brought a tax case — same pattern of misconduct, same Brady violations, same disregard for the defendant's constitutional rights, and the same refusal by the same conflicted appellate court to address any of it. Appeal No. 24-1983 has sat at the Third Circuit since 2024. Scheduled for decision December 2, 2025. Nothing issued.

Those are six. There are 87 more — every one documented, every one on the public record, every one unanswered.