Every significant event from the 2019 investigation through the present Supreme Court proceedings. Each entry links to supporting court filings and related violations.
Federal investigation into securities class action claim filing activities. Investigation proceeds without disclosing to targets the controlling Supreme Court precedent (Sprint v. APCC) that establishes the lawfulness of the conduct under scrutiny.
FBI executes search warrants at multiple locations. Assets frozen. Investigation continues to withhold exculpatory controlling law from investigative materials.
United States v. Cammarata, No. 21-cr-427 (E.D. Pa.). Grand jury presented with materially false testimony that assigned claims cannot be legally enforced — directly contradicting Sprint v. APCC Services (2008). Controlling exculpatory law withheld from grand jury.
Three simultaneous actions on same day: (1) Cammarata arrested at Miami International Airport, detained at FDC Miami; (2) SEC files civil complaint in SEC v. Cammarata, 21-cv-4845, seeking ex parte TRO and asset freeze; (3) FBI executes search warrant at NJ office, seizes all records but leaves computers with government cooperating witness.
Judge Chad Kenney signs SEC's proposed TRO verbatim — including typographical errors — without hearing, without evidence, and without any finding of irreparable harm as required by Rule 65 and Winter v. NRDC. Asset freeze imposed while defendant detained in Miami.
SEC files USM-285 form (ECF 10) falsely attesting personal service at 10:50 AM. Handwritten date appears altered from '9' to '8'. Actual service could only have occurred on Nov 9 — after TRO hearing already concluded.
TRO hearing in Philadelphia at 9:00 AM — the exact time defendant is at bail hearing in Miami. Judge Kenney states on record: "I consider this a crime against the courts!" This statement later removed from official transcript (ECF 41 → ECF 46), replaced with "[inaudible]".
Judge Kenney extends TRO through December 14, 2021 — quadruple the 14-day maximum permitted by Rule 65(b)(2). Extension granted without required good cause finding specific to defendant.
Under Rule 65(b)(2), ex parte TRO expires at 11:59 PM — 14 days after entry. As a matter of law, no valid order supports asset freeze after this date. Government continues enforcing void order for 4+ years.
Neither district court ever issues the certification required by the Due Process Protections Act of 2020 (Fed. R. Crim. P. 5(f)), which mandates courts remind prosecutors of Brady disclosure obligations. This failure continues throughout all proceedings.
Second indictment: United States v. Cammarata, No. 22-cr-639 (D.N.J.). Grand jury transcript shows prosecutors repeatedly described unresolved fraud allegations from Pennsylvania case as established fact — weeks before that trial even began.
Cammarata files pro se summary judgment motion (ECF 183) in SEC case detailing jurisdictional and due process violations. Court never rules on this motion. Motion remains pending through summary judgment entered against him.
Law firm Ballard Spahr submits detailed petition to Judge Kenney outlining SEC's failure to state a claim and constitutional violations. Judge Kenney intentionally fails to docket this letter, suppressing independent professional corroboration of misconduct.
At sentencing, Cammarata references Judge Kenney's "crime against the courts" statement. This portion of transcript altered to remove his statement "I realize the first statement you made..." — rendering passage nonsensical.
Day after criminal sentencing, SEC files 900-page summary judgment motion (ECF 260). Motion never served on defendant while detained. Court ignores lack of service, grants judgment anyway.
Notice of Appeal filed: United States v. Cammarata, No. 23-2110 (3d Cir.). Appeal raises Sprint v. APCC argument that charged conduct is not a crime, Rule 5(f) violations, Brady violations.
Tax trial before Judge Peter Sheridan (D.N.J.). Government abandons indictment theory, presents entirely different case at trial. Jury instructions permit conviction on uncharged theories. Guilty verdicts returned November 15, 2023.
SEC v. Cammarata, No. 24-1381 (3d Cir.) filed. Appeal challenges recusal denial, judgment entered without jurisdiction, and expired TRO enforcement. Government never files response brief.
After five continuances, Judge Sheridan holds sentencing. Nearly an hour in, Cammarata notes court never ruled on post-trial motions. Judge — who had Parkinson's and announced retirement — orally denies all motions without review, proceeds to sentence.
United States v. Cammarata, No. 24-1983 (3d Cir.) filed. Appeal raises constructive amendment, Brady violations, Rule 5(f) violations.
SEC appeal 24-1381 now pending 18+ months. Government has never filed a response brief. Third Circuit grants SEC repeated extensions while denying defendant's requests to lift stay.
In re Cammarata, No. 25-1188 (3d Cir.). Emergency petition for writ of mandamus filed documenting all violations, requesting transfer to conflict-free circuit. Government enters appearance but never files substantive response.
Mandamus petition perfected. Government respondents enter appearances (ECF 9, 10) but file no opposition. Petition remains unopposed. Court takes no action.
In 24-1983, Cammarata moves to discharge attorney due to complete breakdown in communication. Attorney files own withdrawal motion. Court denies both, forces defendant to remain represented by counsel he has deemed ineffective.
In re Cammarata, No. 25-6128. Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed with U.S. Supreme Court documenting complete breakdown of justice in Third Circuit. Docketed November 14, 2025.
Case 24-1983 submitted on briefs per court's own scheduling order. As of December 8, six days later, no ruling issued. Pattern of deliberate non-adjudication continues.
In extraordinary action, Solicitor General files waiver of government's right to respond to Supreme Court mandamus petition. 93 documented constitutional violations now stand entirely uncontested by the United States.
Petition No. 25-6128 scheduled for conference. Government has waived response, leaving documented violations uncontested.
Four related appeals remain pending. SEC appeal (24-1381): Government has never filed response brief in 21+ months. Mandamus (25-1188): Unopposed for 11+ months, no ruling. Criminal appeal mandate issued but based on opinion refusing to address controlling law.