The Exposé

Proven Innocence. Documented Injustice.

At the core of this exposé is a simple, legally proven fact: there was never a crime. In trial proceedings, it was established that Mr. Cammarata owned many billions of valid trades, which he then lawfully assigned to a beneficial owner. That beneficial owner filed class-action claims under U.S. Supreme Court precedent and Pennsylvania assignment law—laws that clearly support his conduct. Under Sprint Communications v. APCC Services (2008), when an assignor transfers “all rights, title, and interest” in legal claims to an assignee, the assignee becomes the beneficial party with full legal standing to file claims in their own name. Prosecutors indicted Mr. Cammarata and took him to trial, but could not publicly admit they were wrong—so they resorted to misconduct and built a case to force a wrongful conviction. Over the past three years, federal judges and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals have perpetuated this injustice, refusing to apply binding Supreme Court law, ignoring conflicts of interest such as a prosecutor’s spouse representing the appeals court, and failing to rule on critical motions. This refusal to apply clearly controlling law is irrefutable proof of Mr. Cammarata’s innocence—and evidence of a systemic cover-up.

Legal Foundations

The legality of Mr. Cammarata’s conduct is not speculative—it is anchored in clear and controlling law:

  • Sprint Communications v. APCC Services, 554 U.S. 269 (2008): The Supreme Court held that when an assignor transfers “all rights, title, and interest” in claims to an assignee, the assignee becomes the beneficial owner with standing to pursue those claims in their own name.
  • Pennsylvania Assignment Act of 1939: Confirms that the transfer of claims through assignment is lawful, enforceable, and grants the assignee full rights as if they were the original owner.

Together, these authorities prove that the billions of trades Mr. Cammarata lawfully assigned were properly pursued in class-action claims by the beneficial owner, exactly as the law allows.

View All the Violations

Systemic Coordination and Conflicts of Interest

According to Mr. Cammarata’s filings and exhibits, federal agencies and judicial officers operated in a coordinated manner to engineer outcomes against him. The Department of Justice advanced a defective indictment, while the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a parallel civil action that functioned primarily to freeze and liquidate assets needed for his defense.

  • Parallel proceedings & information flow: Civil SEC actions and criminal processes advanced on overlapping calendars, creating one-sided momentum while Mr. Cammarata lacked timely notice and the ability to be heard.
  • Conflicted decision-makers: The presiding judge and enforcement counsel proceeded despite clear conflicts, undermining the appearance and reality of impartial adjudication.
  • Ex parte asset control: An ex parte TRO and subsequent orders were used to freeze—and later liquidate—assets, including third-party and foreign property, without proper jurisdictional findings or taint analysis.
  • Suppression & record irregularities: Exculpatory materials were resisted or minimized, and key transcripts and docket submissions were mishandled or withheld, impeding appellate scrutiny.
  • Delay as a tactic: Prolonged inaction on dispositive motions and petitions functioned as a constructive denial of relief while consequences (including asset sales) became irreversible.
  • Disregard of controlling law: Courts and agencies repeatedly refused to apply directly controlling Supreme Court and Third Circuit precedent central to Mr. Cammarata’s defenses.

Source documents: Selected Filings and the Case Filings archive.

Criminal Fraud Case: Defective Indictment and Blocked Defense

The DOJ pursued a criminal fraud case predicated on a defective indictment. In parallel, the SEC’s civil action was used to freeze Mr. Cammarata’s assets, thereby depriving him of funds to retain counsel of choice. This tactic violated the Due Process Protections Act of 2020 and the obligations codified in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(f), which require prosecutors to disclose exculpatory evidence and courts to enforce those duties.

Courts refused to apply controlling authorities that demonstrated the lawfulness of Mr. Cammarata’s conduct—most notably Pennsylvania’s Assignment Act of 1939 and the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Sprint Communications v. APCC Services (2008), which recognize the validity of assignments and the right of assignees to pursue claims.

Criminal Tax Case: Egregious Government Misconduct

In a separate criminal tax matter, the government engaged in egregious misconduct that compounded the due-process violations. Exculpatory IRS and financial records were suppressed or selectively withheld, loss calculations were inflated through double counting, and adverse rulings relied on incomplete or extra-record materials—all while Mr. Cammarata’s access to resources for defense was obstructed.

SEC Enforcement Action: No Jury, No Jurisdiction, Massive Harm

The SEC case became a showcase of judicial overreach. The District Court denied Mr. Cammarata his Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial and granted summary judgment for the SEC despite a meritorious defense motion (ECF No. 183) that has never received a ruling. Subject-matter jurisdiction was lacking from the outset, yet foreign and third-party assets—including a Bahamian life-insurance trust—were frozen and liquidated without lawful authority.

The forced liquidation of Palantir (PLTR) shares from that trust caused over $65 million in damages as the stock later appreciated—losses that would have been avoided had due process and jurisdictional limits been observed.

The Third Circuit’s Failure to Intervene

Instead of correcting these abuses, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit allowed them to persist. Mandamus petitions and emergency motions languished without substantive rulings. Evidence of judicial bias, transcript tampering, and jurisdictional defects remained unaddressed.